We offer 24/7 customer assisting service to help our candidates downloading and using our NetSec-Analyst : Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam dumps with no doubts. No matter what kind of problems you meet please don't be shy to let us know, it's our pleasure to help you in any way. Please feel free to contact us about Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam prep torrent whenever, our aim is that the customers should always come first.
Our Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst practice prep dumps are always focus on researching the newest and most comprehensive exam dumps, which can give our candidates the most helpful guide. Our experienced Palo Alto Networks experts keep the path with all the newest braindumps and knowledge points, and update our Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst practice prep dumps every day for our candidates. We guarantee the candidates who bought our NetSec-Analyst training braindumps can get the most authoritative and reliable dumps to help you pass the Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam and get a high score.
Our service is not only to provide NetSec-Analyst training braindumps to download successfully but also include any doubts or questions we will face with you together in one year after you buy our Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst study braindumps. After the candidates buy our products, we can offer our new updated dumps for your downloading one year for free. And our Palo Alto Networks experts always keep the path with the newest updating of Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst certification center. You only need to check your mail if any updates about NetSec-Analyst training braindumps.
If you want to get a higher salary job and have a higher level life, to achieve a high quality Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst certification is the key. But we all know that it's difficult and time costing to achieve the certification without some valid solution. Our Palo Alto Networks Certification NetSec-Analyst valid braindumps can be your best and honest assistant which can help you achieve the certification with less time and less energy.
If you are doubt about the authority of our Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst latest prep demo, you can enter our website and download the free demo before you decide to buy. You don't need to pay a cent unless you think our NetSec-Analyst : Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst training braindumps are really suit you and do helpful.
The candidates can receive the mail about our NetSec-Analyst : Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst practice prep dumps in ten minutes after you complete your purchase, you can practice the Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst study braindumps immediately after the candidates land our website. Because we think our candidates must want to practice the exam dumps as soon as possible.
We use the largest and most trusted Credit Card; it can ensure your money safe. We always first consider the candidates' profits while purchasing Palo Alto Networks Certification Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam prep torrent. Our candidates don't need to worry about the information security problem. Your information about purchasing Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst practice prep dumps will never be shared with 3rd parties without your permission. We know how trouble by reveled your personal information, we will won't let this things happen.
In one word, we not only provide the most effective and accurate Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst free prep material to help candidates passing through the test but also provide the most convenient and comprehensive after-sale service. It is possible to succeed if you really take the first step. Our Palo Alto Networks Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam prep torrents are your first step to the success. So just try it, maybe the next successful person is just you!
After purchase, Instant Download: Upon successful payment, Our systems will automatically send the product you have purchased to your mailbox by email. (If not received within 12 hours, please contact us. Note: don't forget to check your spam.)
1. A Security Administrator is configuring a Log Forwarding Profile on a Palo Alto Networks firewall to send traffic logs to both an external syslog server (192.168.1.10:514) for compliance archiving and a proprietary SIEM appliance (192.168.1.20:20514) that requires logs in CEF format. The SIEM appliance is only interested in 'threat' and 'URL' logs. How would the administrator correctly configure the Log Forwarding Profile to meet these requirements, ensuring minimal unnecessary log transmission to the SIEM?
A) Create one Log Forwarding Profile. Under 'Syslog', add 192.168.1.10 as Server A. Add 192.168.1.20 as Server B, set its format to CEF. For Server B, define a custom filter for (log.type eq 'threat' or log.type eq 'url').
B) It's not possible to filter specific log types for a single syslog server within a Log Forwarding Profile; filtering must occur at the SIEM or syslog server level for this granularity.
C) Create one Log Forwarding Profile. Under 'Syslog', add two servers: one for 192.168.1.10 (UDP, default format) and another for 192.168.1.20 (UDP, CEF format). For the 192.168.1.20 server, add filters for 'threat' and 'URL' log types within the profile settings.
D) Create two separate Log Forwarding Profiles. Profile 1 targets 192.168.1.10 with no specific filters. Profile 2 targets 192.168.1.20, selecting 'CEF' as the format and explicitly adding 'threat' and 'URL' as included log types. Apply both profiles to the relevant Security Policies.
E) Configure a single Log Forwarding Profile. Add two Syslog servers, 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.20. For 192.168.1.20, set the format to CEF. To filter, you must apply separate Security Policies, one for general logging to 192.168.1.10 and another for threat/URL logs to 192.168.1.20, each with its own Log Forwarding Profile.
2. A critical infrastructure organization is upgrading its SCADA network and has deployed Palo Alto Networks NGFWs to secure the environment. They need to implement an IoT security profile that strictly adheres to the Purdue Model for segmentation and communication. Specifically, they want to:
1. Allow only specific Modbus/TCP function codes (Read Coils, Read Holding Registers) between Zone 3 (Control Servers) and Zone 2 (PLCs).
2. Block all internet access for devices in Zone 2 and Zone 3.
3. Alert on any new, unclassified device attempting to communicate within Zone 2 or Zone 3.
4. Implement signature-based protection against known ICS exploits.
Which of the following configuration steps, in combination, are necessary to achieve these requirements using a Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Profile and related features? (Multiple Response)
A) Create an 'IoT Security Profile' for ICS, enabling 'Application Function Filtering' for Modbus/TCP to permit only 'Read Coils' and 'Read Holding Registers'. Apply this profile to an 'IoT Policy Rule' between Zone 3 and Zone 2, with 'Application' set to 'modbus-tcp'.
B) Create a custom 'Anti-Spyware' profile with specific Modbus/TCP signatures and apply it to all security rules for Zone 2 and Zone 3 traffic.
C) Configure 'Security Policies' with 'Source Zone: Zone 2/3', 'Destination Zone: Untrust', 'Application: any', 'Service: any', and 'Action: Deny'. Ensure these rules are placed higher than any default permit rules.
D) Configure a 'Vulnerability Protection' profile with a focus on 'Critical' and 'High' severity signatures, especially those related to SCADA/ICS vulnerabilities, and apply it to all relevant security policies.
E) Utilize 'Device-ID' within the IoT Security Profile to automatically identify and classify devices in Zone 2 and Zone 3. Configure 'IoT Policy Rules' to use 'IoT Device Groups' as source/destination and set 'Action: Alert' for unknown device communication attempts.
3. A large enterprise uses a Palo Alto Networks firewall to manage Internet access. They have multiple internal networks, each with its own egress NAT requirements. The network team has defined the following:
1. 'Internal _ Dev' (10.0.10.0/24) needs to Source NAT to a dedicated public IP 203.0.113.100.
2. 'Internal _ Prod' (10.0.20.0/24) needs to Source NAT to a pool of public IPs (203.0.113.101-203.0.113.105) for high concurrency.
3. 'Internal_Guest' (10.0.30.0/24) needs to Source NAT to the firewall's egress interface IP.
All three internal zones egress through the 'External' zone. You need to design the NAT policy order to ensure these requirements are met without conflicting. Which of the following ordered NAT policy sets (top to bottom) would achieve the desired outcome, assuming the External interface IP is 203.0.113.1?
A)
B)
C)
D)
E) The order of Source NAT policies does not matter; only Destination NAT policy order is critical.
4. Consider the following firewall policy configuration snippet from a Panorama managed firewall:
An analyst observes internal users are still able to browse external HTTP websites, contradicting the 'Block-External-Browsing' rule. Using Policy Optimizer, Command Center, and Activity Insights, what is the most likely reason for this behavior, and how would these tools help identify and rectify it? (Select all that apply)
A) Most Likely Reason: The 'Allow-Internal-HTTP' rule is shadowing 'Block-External-Browsing'. Tool Action: Policy Optimizer would highlight 'Allow-Internal-HTTP' as a shadowed rule or show its 'usage' affecting external traffic. Command Center would show sessions hitting 'Allow-Internal-HTTP' for external destinations.
B) Most Likely Reason: Users are bypassing the firewall using a VPN. Tool Action: Activity Insights would show a drop in 'web-browsing' activity but an increase in VPN application usage. Command Center would show VPN tunnel traffic bypassing policy checks.
C) Most Likely Reason: The firewall is not configured to perform App-ID on HTTP traffic. Tool Action: Activity Insights would show traffic categorized as 'unknown- tcp' instead of 'web-browsing' for HTTP. Command Center would display sessions with 'unknown-tcp' as the application.
D) Most Likely Reason: The 'service' in 'Block-External-Browsing' is 'any', making it less specific than 'Allow-Internal-HTTP' and thus being hit first for internal traffic. Tool Action: Policy Optimizer would recommend making the 'Block-External-Browsing' rule more specific, possibly by adding a source or destination zone.
E) Most Likely Reason: The 'Block-External-Browsing' rule is placed lower in the rulebase than 'Allow-Internal-HTTP'. Tool Action: Policy Optimizer's 'Rule Order' view would visually indicate the incorrect placement. Command Center session logs would confirm traffic hitting 'Allow-Internal-HTTP' instead of 'Block-External-Browsing'.
5. A network administrator is designing an SD-WAN profile for a branch office that requires strict QOS for VoIP traffic and dynamic path selection based on real-time link quality. The branch has two ISP links: one MPLS and one Internet broadband. The administrator wants VoIP to always prefer MPLS if its jitter is below 10ms, otherwise failover to broadband. For general web traffic, a balanced distribution across both links is desired. Which of the following SD-WAN profile configurations, when combined, would best achieve this, assuming a basic Path Monitoring profile is already defined?
A) Create a custom application for VoIP, assign it a 'High' priority in the QOS profile, and use a 'Best Quality' path selection profile for the VoIP application, prioritizing MPLS. Configure a 'Session Distribution' method for web traffic.
B) Define a service route for VoIP over MPLS, and another for broadband. Apply a health-check monitor to the MPLS link for VoIP traffic with a jitter threshold. For web traffic, configure policy-based forwarding to distribute sessions.
C) Define a 'VoIP' application group, create an SD-WAN policy rule with VoIP' as the application, set 'Link Quality' as the Path Selection metric with a 'Jitter' threshold of 1 Oms for MPLS, and a 'Weighted Round Robin' load balancing for other traffic.
D) Configure an SD-WAN policy rule with 'Application: VoIP', a 'Path Quality' profile preferring MPLS with a Jitter threshold, and a 'Dynamic Path Monitoring' profile to constantly assess link health. For web traffic, use 'Session Distribution' with an 'Equal Cost Multi-Path' (ECMP) routing.
E) Implement an SD-WAN profile with a 'Performance-Based' policy for VoIP, specifying a 'Jitter' SLAof 1 Oms for MPLS. For web traffic, use a 'Load Balancing' policy with 'Session Distribution' across available links.
Solutions:
Question # 1 Answer: A | Question # 2 Answer: A,C,D,E | Question # 3 Answer: A | Question # 4 Answer: A,E | Question # 5 Answer: E |
Over 40504+ Satisfied Customers
BraindumpsPrep Practice Exams are written to the highest standards of technical accuracy, using only certified subject matter experts and published authors for development - no all study materials.
If you prepare for the exams using our BraindumpsPrep testing engine, It is easy to succeed for all certifications in the first attempt. You don't have to deal with all dumps or any free torrent / rapidshare all stuff.
We are committed to the process of vendor and third party approvals. We believe professionals and executives alike deserve the confidence of quality coverage these authorizations provide.
BraindumpsPrep offers free demo of each product. You can check out the interface, question quality and usability of our practice exams before you decide to buy.